Understanding the 10 Root Conditions: Data Maturity Foundations
Overview
The 10 Root Conditions framework represents the academic backbone for assessing your organisation's current data maturity and identifying specific areas for improvement. Based on research by Lee and Pipino, these conditions provide a systematic lens for understanding data quality challenges across people analytics and workforce intelligence systems.
Rather than presenting generic problems, each root condition breaks down complex data challenges into specific pain points, enabling targeted interventions and measurable progress towards data maturity.
What Are the Root Conditions?
The framework examines ten fundamental conditions that frequently appear in organisational contexts:
Multiple Data Sources - Conflicting information across systems
Subjective Judgement - Human interpretation affecting data consistency
Resource Limitations - Infrastructure constraints impacting data access
Security vs Accessibility - Balancing protection with analytical needs
Diverse Coding Systems - Incompatible classification schemes across functions
Complex Data Representation - Unstructured qualitative insights trapped in text
Data Volume and Processing - Relationships between information quantity and capability
Data Input Standards - Variable recording practices affecting reliability
Evolving Information Requirements - Misalignment between historical collection and current needs
System Integration - Architectural challenges in distributed information systems
Why These Conditions Matter
For Business Leaders and Organisations
The root conditions provide a diagnostic framework to:
Assess current state: Identify which specific conditions are limiting your data maturity
Prioritise investments: Focus resources on addressing the conditions creating the greatest pain points
Measure progress: Track improvement across specific, well-defined dimensions rather than vague "data quality" goals
Build competitive advantage: Systematically advance through Data Readiness Levels (DRL) towards DRL 7 and beyond
Enable Predictive People Analytics and AI readiness: Address foundational data issues that prevent effective Predictive People Analytics and AI implementation
Drive strategic decisions: Access unified people intelligence for workforce planning, succession, organisational design and AI enablement
Reduce operational costs: Eliminate inefficiencies caused by fragmented data and manual processes
Manage risk: Ensure compliance and identify potential legal exposures through systematic data quality
Enhance fairness: Detect and prevent bias in hiring, promotion, and compensation decisions
For Academics and Researchers
The framework enables:
Structured research design: Target specific root conditions with real organisational use cases
Comparative studies: Examine how different organisations address the same condition
Intervention effectiveness: Measure the impact of specific solutions against well-defined problems
Theory development: Build upon a shared conceptual foundation for data maturity research
Cross-sector insights: Apply consistent assessment criteria across industries
Longitudinal studies: Track organisational progression through data maturity levels over time
Evidence-based practice: Connect academic research directly to practical implementation challenges
Publication opportunities: Contribute to case study development and academic literature
Collaboration networks: Engage with practitioners implementing frameworks in real-world contexts
For Developers and Technical Teams
Understanding root conditions helps developers:
Design targeted solutions: Build tools that address specific, well-defined data challenges
Prioritise features: Focus development efforts on capabilities that resolve critical root conditions
Integrate effectively: Understand where systems need to connect to address integration-related conditions
Optimise architecture: Design systems that support progression through data maturity levels
Enable scalability: Build infrastructure that grows with organisational expansion
Support real-time analytics: Create in-house architecture designed for Predictive People Analytics and AI enablement.
For Policy Makers and Regulators
The framework supports policy development by:
Establishing standards: Create data governance policies aligned with recognised maturity conditions
Defining compliance: Set clear expectations around data quality dimensions
Assessing readiness: Evaluate organisational capability using consistent criteria
Guiding investment: Direct funding towards addressing systemic data infrastructure gaps
Enabling benchmarking: Compare data maturity across organisations and sectors
Protecting individuals: Ensure privacy-preserving approaches to people analytics
Promoting equity: Establish requirements for bias detection and fair decision-making systems
Facilitating transparency: Require systematic documentation of data quality and AI readiness
For Technology Vendors
Vendors can leverage this framework to:
Classify offerings: Clearly articulate which root conditions your solution addresses
Differentiate products: Position solutions based on the specific data maturity challenges they resolve
Map to DRL progression: Demonstrate how your technology helps organisations advance towards DRL 7
Bundle strategically: Combine capabilities that address complementary root conditions
Measure customer success: Track improvements in specific conditions rather than vague "satisfaction" metrics
Validate effectiveness: Provide evidence of impact against recognised data maturity dimensions
Partner strategically: Identify complementary vendors addressing different root conditions
Example: A vendor might position their platform as addressing Root Conditions 1, 5, and 10 (Multiple Data Sources, Diverse Coding Systems, and System Integration), enabling organisations to progress from DRL 3 to DRL 7 through unified people intelligence architecture.
The Data-as-a-Product Approach
For each root condition, the framework presents a strategic "Data-as-a-Product" use case that transforms the challenge into a competitive advantage. This approach emphasises:
Strategic intelligence over operational data: Treating people data as curated intelligence assets rather than administrative by-products
Predictive capability: Building systems designed for forecasting, proactive decision-making and seamless AI enablement
Unified architecture: Creating integrated platforms rather than disconnected point solutions
Continuous improvement: Implementing frameworks that evolve with organisational needs
Understanding Pain Points
Each root condition is accompanied by comprehensive pain points that illustrate real-world impacts:
Operational inefficiencies: How the condition slows down processes and increases costs
Strategic blind spots: Critical insights that remain hidden due to data limitations
Risk and compliance issues: Potential legal or regulatory exposures
Competitive disadvantages: Opportunities missed due to inadequate data capability
AI readiness barriers: Specific obstacles preventing effective AI implementation
Implementation Benefits
The framework outlines key advantages organisations gain by addressing each condition, for instance:
Predictive retention: Identify flight risk 6+ months in advance
Quality hiring: Connect recruitment sources with long-term performance
Fair progression: Ensure equitable career advancement through objective data
Optimal teams: Form project teams based on complementary skills and proven collaboration patterns
Strategic succession: Build leadership pipelines using complete and standardised capability assessments
Proactive equity: Detect and prevent compensation bias systematically
Getting Started
Whether you're a business leader, researcher, developer, policy maker, or technology vendor, the 10 Root Conditions framework provides:
Common language: Shared terminology for discussing data maturity challenges
Diagnostic tool: Systematic method for evaluating current state
Roadmap framework: Clear pathway for progressing through data maturity levels
Collaboration opportunities: Structured approach for working with researchers and other implementers
Benchmarking criteria: Consistent standards for measuring progress