The DRL Framework as a Standards Framework for People Analytics and AI Enablement Transformation

What is the Data Readiness Level (DRL) Framework

The DRL framework transforms People Analytics AI enablement from an ambiguous aspiration ("we need better data quality") into a standardised programme with clear specifications, measurable milestones, and validated outcomes. It provides the architectural standards organisations need to systematically build Predictive People Analytics and AI-ready people data infrastructure rather than hoping existing approaches will eventually support AI effectiveness.

By serving five key stakeholder communities with equal relevance, business organisations, academics, developers, policy makers, and vendors, the DRL framework creates the ecosystem-wide alignment necessary for responsible and effective People Analytics and AI deployment at scale.

Standards Framework Definition

The Data Readiness Levels (DRL) framework functions as a maturity and standards model that provides organisations with:

1. Diagnostic Standardisation

  • Common assessment criteria across the ten root conditions

  • Benchmarking capability to identify current state (typically DRL 5-6 for most organisations)

  • Gap analysis structure showing distance from Predictive People Analytics and AI-ready state (DRL 7)

  • Objective measurement replacing subjective "data quality" assessments

2. Architectural Standards

The framework defines specific structural requirements at each level:

DRL 5-6 Standard: Data as technology by-product

  • System-generated logs and transactions

  • Reactive quality management

  • Analytics-ready ≠ AI-ready

DRL 7 Standard: Data as intentional product

  • Data-as-a-Product principles implemented

  • Proactive quality management (TDQM)

  • Predictive People Analytics and AI-consumption design criteria met across ten root conditions

This creates a clear specification for what "Predictive People Analytics and AI-ready people data architecture" actually means.

3. Implementation Roadmap Standards

The DRL framework provides a sequenced transformation pathway:

Phase 1: Assessment Against Standards

  • Audit current data collection against ten root conditions

  • Map existing practices to DRL levels

  • Identify which conditions block progression to DRL 7

Phase 2: DRL 7 Initiative Design

Using the framework's standards for each root condition:

  • Governance standards → Establish Data-as-a-Product Manager (DPM) roles with defined accountabilities

  • Collection standards → Redesign data capture to meet Predictive People Analytics and AI-consumption requirements

  • Quality standards → Implement Total Data Quality Management (TDQM) methodology systematically

  • Integration standards → Ensure interoperability across people data products

Phase 3: Validated Progression

  • Measure improvements against DRL criteria

  • Validate readiness for Predictive People Analytics and AI deployment

  • Demonstrate compliance with DRL 7 standards before people analytics and AI investment

4. Stakeholder Alignment Standards

The framework provides common language across five key stakeholder communities:

Business Organisations

  • Executive leadership → Investment requirements and returns at each DRL level

  • HR/People functions → Data ownership responsibilities and Data-as-a-Product accountability

  • IT/Technology teams → Infrastructure requirements supporting DRL 7 progression

  • Analytics teams → Data fitness criteria for predictive model deployment

  • Benchmarking capability → Compare organisational maturity against industry standards

Academics

  • Research standardisation → Comparable studies using consistent maturity definitions

  • Theoretical validation → Empirical testing of DRL progression hypotheses

  • Pedagogy framework → Teaching People Analytics using structured capability levels

  • Knowledge advancement → Collaborative exploration of DRL 8-9 capabilities

  • Evidence base → Longitudinal studies tracking AI effectiveness correlations

Developers

  • System design specifications → Technical requirements for DRL 7 architecture

  • API standards → Data interfaces designed for AI consumption

  • Quality assurance criteria → Automated validation against ten root conditions

  • Integration patterns → Standardised approaches for connecting Data Products

  • Tool validation → Benchmarking whether development tools enable DRL advancement

Policy Makers

  • Regulatory standards baseline → DRL 7 as minimum requirement for AI deployment in high-stakes decisions

  • Compliance frameworks → Auditable criteria for responsible AI deployment

  • Industry guidance → Evidence-based recommendations for AI readiness investment

  • Risk mitigation policy → Standards preventing premature AI deployment

  • Cross-jurisdiction alignment → Common framework enabling international policy coordination

Vendors

  • Procurement requirements → Clear specifications for systems supporting DRL 7 capabilities

  • Product roadmaps → Technical requirements preventing DRL 5-6 limitations

  • Certification standards → DRL 7 compliance validation for platforms

  • Competitive differentiation → Demonstrable support for Predictive People Analytics and AI-ready architecture

  • Customer alignment → Shared language for capability discussions

5. Quality Assurance Standards

DRL 7 establishes verifiable quality criteria:

  • The ten root conditions now have measurable standards

  • Progression requires demonstrated capability, not claimed maturity

  • Third-party assessment possible using standardised criteria

  • Prevents "checkbox compliance" through structural requirements

6. Risk Management Standards

The framework provides investment protection:

  • Pre-investment validation → Don't deploy AI until DRL 7 standards met

  • Failure prevention → Systematic addressing of root conditions before Predictive People Analytics and AI deployment

  • Resource allocation → Focus investment on structural readiness, not symptom treatment

  • ROI protection → Ensure Predictive People Analytics and AI deployment will function before procurement

Practical Application: The DRL 7 Initiative Framework

Standard Components Required

Organisations using DRL as a standards framework for their initiative must:

  • Establish baseline against all ten root conditions using DRL criteria

  • Design remediation programmes for each condition below standard

  • Implement Data-as-a-Product governance meeting DRL 7 specifications

  • Deploy Total Data Quality Management (TDQM) methodology systematically across people data

  • Validate achievement against DRL 7 criteria before Predictive People Analytics and AI deployment

Standard Governance Structure

  • Data-as-a-Product Council → Strategic oversight

  • Data-as-a-Product (DPM) Managers → Operational accountability

  • Quality Assurance Function → Standards compliance verification

  • Multi-Stakeholder Forum → Cross-functional and ecosystem alignment

Standard Success Metrics

  • Progression from DRL 5-6 to DRL 7 against each root condition

  • Predictive People Analytics performance and consistency

  • Reduction in data preparation requirements

  • Stakeholder confidence in AI enablement initatives and generated insights

Multi-Stakeholder Ecosystem Benefits

The DRL framework creates ecosystem-wide alignment where:

  • Businesses follow validated transformation pathways and benchmark progress

  • Academics conduct comparable research and advance theoretical understanding

  • Developers build to technical specifications enabling Predictive People Analytics and AI readiness

  • Policy makers establish evidence-based regulatory frameworks

  • Vendors design products that genuinely support DRL 7 capabilities

The Standards Advantage

By functioning as a standards framework, DRL enables organisations to:

Avoid trial-and-error approaches → Follow validated transformation pathway
Ensure consistency → All people data products meet same AI-readiness standards
Enable comparison → Benchmark against other organisations using common framework
Demonstrate compliance → Prove readiness using objective criteria
Manage vendors → Specify requirements using standardised language
Protect investment → Ensure prerequisites met before AI deployment
Engage policy makers → Contribute to evidence-based regulation
Advance research → Enable academic validation and knowledge creation
Guide development → Provide technical specifications for AI-ready systems